Calcific tendinopathy refers to the deposit of calcium in a tendon, most often in those of the rotator cuff muscles of the shoulder. The most commonly affected tendon is the Supraspinatus which is observed in 80% of cases (Serafini et al., 2009).
The exact cause of calcific tendinopathy is unclear; however, several have been suggested including reduced blood flow, excessive compression, those with a metabolic disorder and with local degeneration. Calcific tendinopathy can be present in 2.5-7.5% of asymptomatic shoulders, it is seen significantly more commonly in females (70% of cases) and those in their 40’s.
Typically, calcific tendinopathy will come on gradually with relatively low severity shoulder pain which typically worsens overnight and can limit shoulder movement.
There are 3 stages of clinical presentation:
(Fusaro et al., 2011; Gimblett et al., 1999)
Physiotherapy input will allow a progressive rehabilitation and self-management programme to be implemented both in cases where medical management has taken place and in the early stages before the condition has progressed to a chronic issue. Exercise prescription will help restore full shoulder movement and strengthen the associated rotator cuff tendon. Manual therapy techniques including joint and soft tissue mobilisations may be used to support recovery. All of these modalities will help increase blood flow to the associated structures to allow natural reabsorption processes to take place.
In the first instance, medical management usually is that of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or a steroid injection but there is little evidence that they promote reabsorption of calcium deposits.
Ultrasound-guided needle aspiration under local anaesthetic has been previously employed to remove some of the calcium deposits with favourable outcomes up to 2 years. This is most effective when performed early in the condition’s development when the deposits can be removed easier.
Surgical removal through arthroscopy is an option for patients in chronic cases when the calcium deposits are harder. It is also thought that the surgical procedure stimulates the body’s calcium reabsorption system which is desirable (Lam et al., 2006).
Fusaro, I., Orsini, S., Diani, S., Saffioti, G., Zaccarelli, L., & Galletti, S. (2011). Functional results in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder treated with rehabilitation after ultrasonic-guided approach. Musculoskeletal surgery, 95(1), 31-36.
Gimblett, P. A., Saville, J., & Ebrall, P. (1999). A conservative management protocol for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 22(9), 622-627.
Lam, F., Bhatia, D., Van Rooyen, K., & de Beer, J. F. (2006). Modern management of calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. Current Orthopaedics, 20(6), 446-452.
Serafini, G., Sconfienza, L. M., Lacelli, F., Silvestri, E., Aliprandi, A., & Sardanelli, F. (2009). Rotator cuff calcific tendonitis: short-term and 10-year outcomes after two-needle US-guided percutaneous treatment—nonrandomized controlled trial. Radiology, 252(1), 157-164.